I get where you're coming from, but IMO, everything about running data - who's executing it, where, how we bounce back when things go sideways - that's all part of the ADLC workflow.
Sure, it's tempting to turn this into a tools conversation (and fun, let's be honest), but there's a reason we've got data-specific software - because the lifecycle contains more steps.
I get where you're coming from, but IMO, everything about running data - who's executing it, where, how we bounce back when things go sideways - that's all part of the ADLC workflow.
Sure, it's tempting to turn this into a tools conversation (and fun, let's be honest), but there's a reason we've got data-specific software - because the lifecycle contains more steps.
I get where you're coming from, but IMO, everything about running data - who's executing it, where, how we bounce back when things go sideways - that's all part of the ADLC workflow.
Sure, it's tempting to turn this into a tools conversation (and fun, let's be honest), but there's a reason we've got data-specific software - because the lifecycle contains more steps.